Moore's Beach Monster - Santa Cruz, California

Another interesting article on CSE's website tackles another possible type of plesiosaurus. I can't emphasize enough how much this stuff literally fascinates and excites me! I love reading about this. This kind of research and testimony only confirms God's word and puts to shame the "millions of years" religion. There are countless stories of various sightings of historic creatures being spotted, found and/or washing up on shores. This story was of a type of plesiosaurus found washed up on Monterey Bay by Charles Moore in California 70 yrs ago. It's a very interesting story and I'm looking forward to hearing what you think and conclude after hearing the findings for yourself. What's striking is that almost all of the accounts say the same thing when describing the creature. They all describe the head as looking like a ducks head and it's neck ranging from 30-35 ft long. These are separate eye witness accounts and though we have to judge them carefully I can't help but notice the harmony in their descriptions. I think we should really take them into account. Additionally, famous world renowned and respectable scientist have thoroughly examined and investigated the creature and concluded that this was some type of "prehistoric" creature.

E.L. Wallace, a man who served twice as president of the Natural History Society of British Columbia said:

"My examination of the monster was quite thorough. I felt in its mouth and found
it had no teeth. Its head is large and its neck fully twenty feet long. The body
is weak and the tail is only three feet in length from the end of the backbone.
These facts do away with the whale theory, as the backbone of a whale is far
larger than any bone in this animal. Again, its tail is too weak for an animal
of the deep and does away with that last version. "With a bill like it
possesses, it must have lived on herbage . . . I would call it a type of
plesiosaurus."

I also told you all that I would do a post on the TRex blood cells found in fresh bones in 1990. I will supply a link to one of the hundreds of stories written on the find and also incorporate a cool video on the topic. And I will also note once again that the find further shows how the evolutionary theory is one of the greatest hindrances to science that man has ever known. I say this because some who have examined the TRex are stunned as to how red blood cells could have survived for 65 million years.

"Bones, of course, don’t stay fresh very long—certainly not for millions of
years. These discoveries clearly indicate that dinosaurs were around
recently". - Dr. Robert Doolan

They are baffled at this! Not for once contemplating that maybe there is a possibility that it's not 65 million years old and falls perfectly in line with a young earth which is what the bible has stated all along. Note to evolutionists: "TAKE THE EVOLUTIONARY GOGGLES OFF AND GO WHERE THE EVIDENCE TAKES YOU!" It is also by no means a stretch to say that there could possibly be dinosaurs still among us today. There are countless harmonious sightings all over the world. In addition there are remote places in the world (like the remote jungles of the Republic of the Congo, in central western Africa) that haven't even been explored yet due to their vast size. http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v15/i4/dinosaurs.asp

We are uncovering new species all the time. Most of the dinosaurs fossils found are from small dinosaurs the size of chickens. The percentage escapes me at this time but it's a fairly large percent.

Moore's Beach Monster: Article & Pics (Note the head shots of the unmistakable plesiosaurus)
http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=115


TRex Blood Cells Found: Article
http://christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c026.html

Video: